News

A rapidly moving beast: Australian regulatory reforms to tackle ‘greenwashing’ and the lessons we are learning

The latest issue of the International Bar Association’s Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law features commentary by Bennett’s Reid Thornett, co-authored by Michelle Brooks, Michael Tangonan, Tom Webb and Phillipa McCormack.

The abstract for the piece is as follows:

Governments and corporate actors around the world are setting ambitious targets for mitigating climate change and halting and reversing the destruction of nature. The public – individuals, communities, and corporate and nongovernment organisations – expect these commitments to be achieved, so corporate claims about climate and nature are, increasingly, being closely scrutinised. Representations and commitments about climate or environmental credentials that are false, misleading, or unsubstantiated have come to be known as ‘greenwashing’. Greenwashing can undermine the integrity of initiatives to achieve climate and sustainability targets, and the credibility of both corporate perpetrators and the regulatory framework itself. In this paper, we examine the Australian legal framework and reforms that are currently underway, along with key developments overseas. We propose a series of legal principles that, together, can help to promote a ‘best-practice’ approach to greenwashing, as governments, corporations, and broader civil society respond to the twin crises of climate change and environmental loss.

To Reid more (pun intended), visit here or get in contact with Reid.

Reid is a Director at the National Environmental Law Association (NELA) and National Co-Covenor of the ESG & Sustainability Portfolio.

Reid Thornett

Associate

Disclaimer: The information published in this article is of a general nature and should not be construed as legal advice. Whilst we aim to provide timely, relevant and accurate information, the law may change and circumstances may differ. You should not therefore act in reliance on it without first obtaining specific legal advice.

Related articles

‘They will thank me in the long run’ does not excuse a breach of duty: UK Supreme Court confirms standard of conduct required of individual dissenting directors

When directors disagree about how best to serve their company’s best interests, can a single director unilaterally and covertly pursue their preferred approach because they honestly believe it is the right one? …

arrowRead article

When a subpoena meets an arbitration: Lessons from Brackenridge v AT Brine & Sons Pty Ltd

Picture this: a private arbitration is underway between homeowners and their builder. The homeowners issue a subpoena requiring a third party to produce a wide range of project documents. That third party …

arrowRead article

Bennett announces pro bono partnership with Consumer Credit Legal Service WA

Bennett is pleased to announce its new pro bono partnership with Consumer Credit Legal Service WA (CCLSWA), a community legal centre providing free, confidential legal advice and support to Western Australians experiencing …

arrowRead article